In article <KGjHb.55818$VB2.98416@attbi_s51>, stoutman <.@.> wrote:
> Satan? Is that you?
Couldn't have been... no cross-posting.
For all the good it'll do, I've reported it to both
[email protected] and [email protected] with full headers.
djb
--
There are no socks in my email address.
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati"
In article <[email protected]>, EvoDawg
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Just in case you wanted to know where it came from?
Anonymous remailer. They're canned response to my complaint made it
clear they have no interest in anything their cowardly users post.
djb
--
There are no socks in my email address.
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati"
In article <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> wrote:
> I know it's silly to hope th egov would do anything FOR anyone, but
> wouldn't this be covered by the new anti-spam laws?
No, the post was not spam, simply abusive garbage.
djb
--
There are no socks in my email address.
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati"
Dave Balderstone wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, EvoDawg
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Just in case you wanted to know where it came from?
> Anonymous remailer. They're canned response to my complaint made it
> clear they have no interest in anything their cowardly users post.
> djb
I know it's silly to hope th egov would do anything FOR anyone, but
wouldn't this be covered by the new anti-spam laws?
In all innocence,
Dave in Fairfax
--
reply-to doesn't work
use:
daveldr at att dot net
Inappropriate use? Anonymous remailers are there for the express purpose of
hiding spammers and trolls.
"EvoDawg" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Carver33 wrote:
Please report
> problems or inappropriate use to the remailer administrator at
> <[email protected]>.
>
Satan? Is that you?
"Anonymous Sender" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> SOME PEOPLE PAY FAR TOO MUCH ATTENTION TO THEIR DOGS. ANNIE THE DEAD MUTT
IS ROTTING IN DOGGIE HELL. FUCK THE DEAD BITCH. MAY THE MAGGOTS EAT HER
CORPSE.
>
Carver33 wrote:
> No, just some third rate slime ball who hasn't got a life, so it posts
> this kind of garbage to get a rise out of people who would otherwise
> never even acknowledge it's pitiful existence.
>
> Bill
Path:
nwrddc01.gnilink.net!cyclone2.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border3.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newshosting.com!news-xfer1.atl.newshosting.com!news-out.superfeed.net!propagator2-maxim!feed-maxim.newsfeeds.com!news.bananasplit.info!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
From:
Anonymous Sender <[email protected]>
Comments:
This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was
remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software. Please report
problems or inappropriate use to the remailer administrator at
<[email protected]>.
Newsgroups:
rec.woodworking
Subject:
ANNIE THE MUTT
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Date:
Sat, 27 Dec 2003 12:59:34 +0000 (UTC)
Mail-To-News-Contact:
[email protected]
Organization:
[email protected]
Xref:
cyclone1.gnilink.net rec.woodworking:372102
X-Received-Date:
Sat, 27 Dec 2003 08:05:20 EST (nwrddc01.gnilink.net)
no references
Cannot find a signature in this message!
Just in case you wanted to know where it came from?
Rich
--
"You can lead them to LINUX
but you can't make them THINK"
No, just some third rate slime ball who hasn't got a life, so it posts
this kind of garbage to get a rise out of people who would otherwise
never even acknowledge it's pitiful existence.
Bill
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 17:53:46 GMT, "stoutman" <.@.> wrote:
>Satan? Is that you?
>
>
>
>"Anonymous Sender" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> SOME PEOPLE PAY FAR TOO MUCH ATTENTION TO THEIR DOGS. ANNIE THE DEAD MUTT
>IS ROTTING IN DOGGIE HELL. FUCK THE DEAD BITCH. MAY THE MAGGOTS EAT HER
>CORPSE.
>>
>