On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:43:15 -0500, Mike Marlow <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> "Daniel Turner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> 1 2 3 4 5 . . . . .
>
> Wow. Does anybody use alt.test anymore?
Apparently not. And now prepare for a dozen responses calling you
a net-nazi for mentioning it. (ask me how I know this...)
"Daniel Turner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> 1 2 3 4 5 . . . . .
>
>
Wow. Does anybody use alt.test anymore?
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
In article <[email protected]>, "Daniel Turner" <danet at blueyonder dot co dot uk> wrote:
>1 2 3 4 5 . . . . .
Your test failed - it wound up in rec.woodworking instead of alt.test :-)
--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)
Nobody ever left footprints in the sands of time by sitting on his butt.
And who wants to leave buttprints in the sands of time?
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:43:15 -0500, "Mike Marlow"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Daniel Turner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> 1 2 3 4 5 . . . . .
>>
>>
>
>Wow. Does anybody use alt.test anymore?
no need to .... it is accepted practice here