I've searched the group, but I still have a couple of questions that I
didn't see answers to.
I've got the Rockler single turbine sprayer and some nitrocellulose
lacker primer and lacquer. When I tried spraying straight primer on
some test pieces of plywood last night, the finish was clumpy. After
further research, I decided that the primer needed to be thinned with
lacquer thinner. This did produce a much smoother finish.
However, I'm still confused about how much of the primer to apply. How
much is enough? If I put on one thin coat of primer, you can still see
some of the wood color and it isn't particularly smooth. Should I put
on a second thin coat of primer, or will the smoothness and solid
color come from 2 or more coats of lacquer?
Is one thin coat of primer enough for the lacquer to bond to?
Also, I'm assuming that I need to sand the primer after it has dried.
Is that correct?
Thanks for your help.
Primer is typically used to lay down heavy and sand smooth. Lacquer
doesn't typically have adhesion problems unless you are spraying on
something very smooth so any amount of primer will be fine.
On Jun 4, 7:56 am, [email protected] wrote:
> I've searched the group, but I still have a couple of questions that I
> didn't see answers to.
>
> I've got the Rockler single turbine sprayer and some nitrocellulose
> lacker primer and lacquer. When I tried spraying straight primer on
> some test pieces of plywood last night, the finish was clumpy. After
> further research, I decided that the primer needed to be thinned with
> lacquer thinner. This did produce a much smoother finish.
>
> However, I'm still confused about how much of the primer to apply. How
> much is enough? If I put on one thin coat of primer, you can still see
> some of the wood color and it isn't particularly smooth. Should I put
> on a second thin coat of primer, or will the smoothness and solid
> color come from 2 or more coats of lacquer?
>
> Is one thin coat of primer enough for the lacquer to bond to?
>
> Also, I'm assuming that I need to sand the primer after it has dried.
> Is that correct?
>
> Thanks for your help.
On Jun 4, 11:29 am, "SonomaProducts.com" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Primer is typically used to lay down heavy and sand >smooth.
I never prime clear finishes that are the only finish on a piece.
They are their own best primer, and adhere best to themselves. Unless
there are surface problems that would cause adhesion or finish issues
(fisheyes, craters, etc.) there isn't any need. Especially with
lacquer your first coat will make a great primer.
Lacquer will build nicely if applied properly. Add another coat to
your regimen as the primer.
>Lacquer doesn't typically have adhesion problems >unless you are spraying on something very smooth so >any amount of primer will be fine.
Even then you might have to do something really wrong to keep the
finish from adhering. Lacquer has been used in fine finishing for
many, many decades and most furniture makers have certainly sanded
smooth before application o finish.
> > On Jun 4, 7:56 am, [email protected] wrote:
> > I've got the Rockler single turbine sprayer and some > >nitrocellulose lacker primer and lacquer. When I tried > > spraying straight primer on some test pieces of > >plywood last night, the finish was clumpy.
With a single stage turbine, who knows. I know a lot have had great
success with these machines and their brothers and sisters, but I
would sure think that your mixtures would need to be almost perfect ot
get the gun with that little output to work well.
As far as clumping, my first suspect would be to look at thinning and
pressure adjustments. Check out this thread:
http://tinyurl.com/3axq2p
Clumping can be caused by a lot of other things so if you are going t
be serious about finishing you should keep a notebook with temps,
humidity, product lines, thinners, etc. as well as your mixing
formulas and pressure setups.
> > After further research, I decided that the primer > >needed to be thinned with lacquer thinner. This did > >produce a much smoother finish.
Thinner product with allow a lower pressure gun to push more material
out and distribute it more evenly. Since an HVLP gun doesn't atomize
a finishing agent the way a high pressure gun does, the material must
be thinner to accomodate the "Low Pressure" part of HVLP. Lower
pressure of the HVLP setup doesn't atomize the finishes it sprays,
making all the more important to thin properly.
> > However, I'm still confused about how much of the > >primer to apply. How much is enough? If I put on one > >thin coat of primer, you can still see
> > some of the wood color and it isn't particularly smooth.
Just because you see some of the original wood color doesn't mean it
isn't sealed. However, it does speak to your technique of
application. Unless you are using some very highly figured woods, or
some soft woods with a lot of grain challenges, your primer should be
applied at the same rate and the same thickness on the overall piece
in order to preserve the integrity of the final finish.
Many times the prime coat isn't smooth. However, if you are sanding
off more than nibs or a little bit of dust after you prime, you
probably should 1) sand more before you start finishing, and 2) make
sure you are finishing in a clean area.
In your case though, I am thinking the culprit is that you didn't
apply the primer evenly or at the right viscosity.
> >Should I put on a second thin coat of primer, or will > > the smoothness and solid
> > color come from 2 or more coats of lacquer?
A second coat probably won't hurt anything at all. I am hoping that
when you say "solid color" you are meaning "consistent" color. If you
are spraying piano black, red or white colored lacquer, you have
changed the game.
Assuming "solid" to be "consistent", you should consult the product
manufacturer for proper application thickness. They can help you with
your thinning procedures, and also tell you how thick to apply their
product when spraying. You final taget will probably be around 3 - 4
mil or so, maybe a little more.
You build that one coat at a time. Example: My favorite lacquer is
applied at a 4 mil coat with 10 - 15% thinning in moderate weather.
This dried down to only 1 mil thickness. So to get the manufacturer's
recommended final thickness, I spray another 2 - 3 coats.
> > Is one thin coat of primer enough for the lacquer to >
> > bond to?
Usually.
> > Also, I'm assuming that I need to sand the primer after > > it has dried.
> > Is that correct?
Depends. If my "off the gun" is good and I don't raise any grain, I
don't sand. Sanding raises dust, introduces particulates to the
surface of the work, and suspends dust in the air. Also, incorrect
sanding methods or just a sanding accident can introduce scratches and
swirls into the primer which will reflect into subsequent coats of
finish.
Additionally, there is no reason to sand lacquer for he purpose of
adhesion. It will build fine without any further surface prep.
Let us know how you do.
Robert
Sorry, I thought I was giving enough information, but apparently I
didn't.
I'm using white lacquer, not clear. I'm spraying it onto cabinet grade
birch plywood, so it is already smooth for the most part.
So your suggestion would be to forgo the primer and just start
spraying lacquer?
--Michael
On Jun 4, 2:17 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Jun 4, 11:29 am, "SonomaProducts.com" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Primer is typically used to lay down heavy and sand >smooth.
>
> I never prime clear finishes that are the only finish on a piece.
> They are their own best primer, and adhere best to themselves. Unless
> there are surface problems that would cause adhesion or finish issues
> (fisheyes, craters, etc.) there isn't any need. Especially with
> lacquer your first coat will make a great primer.
>
> Lacquer will build nicely if applied properly. Add another coat to
> your regimen as the primer.
>
> >Lacquer doesn't typically have adhesion problems >unless you are spraying on something very smooth so >any amount of primer will be fine.
>
> Even then you might have to do something really wrong to keep the
> finish from adhering. Lacquer has been used in fine finishing for
> many, many decades and most furniture makers have certainly sanded
> smooth before application o finish.
>
> > > On Jun 4, 7:56 am, [email protected] wrote:
> > > I've got the Rockler single turbine sprayer and some > >nitrocellulose lacker primer and lacquer. When I tried > > spraying straight primer on some test pieces of > >plywood last night, the finish was clumpy.
>
> With a single stage turbine, who knows. I know a lot have had great
> success with these machines and their brothers and sisters, but I
> would sure think that your mixtures would need to be almost perfect ot
> get the gun with that little output to work well.
>
> As far as clumping, my first suspect would be to look at thinning and
> pressure adjustments. Check out this thread:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3axq2p
>
> Clumping can be caused by a lot of other things so if you are going t
> be serious about finishing you should keep a notebook with temps,
> humidity, product lines, thinners, etc. as well as your mixing
> formulas and pressure setups.
>
> > > After further research, I decided that the primer > >needed to be thinned with lacquer thinner. This did > >produce a much smoother finish.
>
> Thinner product with allow a lower pressure gun to push more material
> out and distribute it more evenly. Since an HVLP gun doesn't atomize
> a finishing agent the way a high pressure gun does, the material must
> be thinner to accomodate the "Low Pressure" part of HVLP. Lower
> pressure of the HVLP setup doesn't atomize the finishes it sprays,
> making all the more important to thin properly.
>
> > > However, I'm still confused about how much of the > >primer to apply. How much is enough? If I put on one > >thin coat of primer, you can still see
> > > some of the wood color and it isn't particularly smooth.
>
> Just because you see some of the original wood color doesn't mean it
> isn't sealed. However, it does speak to your technique of
> application. Unless you are using some very highly figured woods, or
> some soft woods with a lot of grain challenges, your primer should be
> applied at the same rate and the same thickness on the overall piece
> in order to preserve the integrity of the final finish.
>
> Many times the prime coat isn't smooth. However, if you are sanding
> off more than nibs or a little bit of dust after you prime, you
> probably should 1) sand more before you start finishing, and 2) make
> sure you are finishing in a clean area.
>
> In your case though, I am thinking the culprit is that you didn't
> apply the primer evenly or at the right viscosity.
>
> > >Should I put on a second thin coat of primer, or will > > the smoothness and solid
> > > color come from 2 or more coats of lacquer?
>
> A second coat probably won't hurt anything at all. I am hoping that
> when you say "solid color" you are meaning "consistent" color. If you
> are spraying piano black, red or white colored lacquer, you have
> changed the game.
>
> Assuming "solid" to be "consistent", you should consult the product
> manufacturer for proper application thickness. They can help you with
> your thinning procedures, and also tell you how thick to apply their
> product when spraying. You final taget will probably be around 3 - 4
> mil or so, maybe a little more.
>
> You build that one coat at a time. Example: My favorite lacquer is
> applied at a 4 mil coat with 10 - 15% thinning in moderate weather.
> This dried down to only 1 mil thickness. So to get the manufacturer's
> recommended final thickness, I spray another 2 - 3 coats.
>
> > > Is one thin coat of primer enough for the lacquer to >
> > > bond to?
>
> Usually.
>
> > > Also, I'm assuming that I need to sand the primer after > > it has dried.
> > > Is that correct?
>
> Depends. If my "off the gun" is good and I don't raise any grain, I
> don't sand. Sanding raises dust, introduces particulates to the
> surface of the work, and suspends dust in the air. Also, incorrect
> sanding methods or just a sanding accident can introduce scratches and
> swirls into the primer which will reflect into subsequent coats of
> finish.
>
> Additionally, there is no reason to sand lacquer for he purpose of
> adhesion. It will build fine without any further surface prep.
>
> Let us know how you do.
>
> Robert
On Jun 4, 3:47 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> Sorry, I thought I was giving enough information, but >apparently I didn't.
>
> I'm using white lacquer, not clear. I'm spraying it onto >cabinet grade birch plywood, so it is already smooth for >the most part.
>
> So your suggestion would be to forgo the primer and >just start spraying lacquer?
>
Wipe off the surface with clen cloth dampened with thinner.
Spray away.
Robert
This depends on your desired outcome.
If you do not want the wood grain to telegraph through the finish,
then you must at least prime it with severl coats sanded flat. Even
the smoothest birch (or any) ply will show the grain through the
paint. This is what primer can do for you and it's main purpose.
There might have been some better choices for a paintable surface than
a wood venred ply but no matter. Prime and sand if you want it really
flat or just spray on the wood if you want to or if it is OK to see
the grain.
(PS I figured out you must be using a colored lacquer in my forst
post)
On Jun 4, 1:47 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> Sorry, I thought I was giving enough information, but apparently I
> didn't.
>
> I'm using white lacquer, not clear. I'm spraying it onto cabinet grade
> birch plywood, so it is already smooth for the most part.
>
> So your suggestion would be to forgo the primer and just start
> spraying lacquer?
>
> --Michael
>
> On Jun 4, 2:17 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 4, 11:29 am, "SonomaProducts.com" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Primer is typically used to lay down heavy and sand >smooth.
>
> > I never prime clear finishes that are the only finish on a piece.
> > They are their own best primer, and adhere best to themselves. Unless
> > there are surface problems that would cause adhesion or finish issues
> > (fisheyes, craters, etc.) there isn't any need. Especially with
> > lacquer your first coat will make a great primer.
>
> > Lacquer will build nicely if applied properly. Add another coat to
> > your regimen as the primer.
>
> > >Lacquer doesn't typically have adhesion problems >unless you are spraying on something very smooth so >any amount of primer will be fine.
>
> > Even then you might have to do something really wrong to keep the
> > finish from adhering. Lacquer has been used in fine finishing for
> > many, many decades and most furniture makers have certainly sanded
> > smooth before application o finish.
>
> > > > On Jun 4, 7:56 am, [email protected] wrote:
> > > > I've got the Rockler single turbine sprayer and some > >nitrocellulose lacker primer and lacquer. When I tried > > spraying straight primer on some test pieces of > >plywood last night, the finish was clumpy.
>
> > With a single stage turbine, who knows. I know a lot have had great
> > success with these machines and their brothers and sisters, but I
> > would sure think that your mixtures would need to be almost perfect ot
> > get the gun with that little output to work well.
>
> > As far as clumping, my first suspect would be to look at thinning and
> > pressure adjustments. Check out this thread:
>
> > http://tinyurl.com/3axq2p
>
> > Clumping can be caused by a lot of other things so if you are going t
> > be serious about finishing you should keep a notebook with temps,
> > humidity, product lines, thinners, etc. as well as your mixing
> > formulas and pressure setups.
>
> > > > After further research, I decided that the primer > >needed to be thinned with lacquer thinner. This did > >produce a much smoother finish.
>
> > Thinner product with allow a lower pressure gun to push more material
> > out and distribute it more evenly. Since an HVLP gun doesn't atomize
> > a finishing agent the way a high pressure gun does, the material must
> > be thinner to accomodate the "Low Pressure" part of HVLP. Lower
> > pressure of the HVLP setup doesn't atomize the finishes it sprays,
> > making all the more important to thin properly.
>
> > > > However, I'm still confused about how much of the > >primer to apply. How much is enough? If I put on one > >thin coat of primer, you can still see
> > > > some of the wood color and it isn't particularly smooth.
>
> > Just because you see some of the original wood color doesn't mean it
> > isn't sealed. However, it does speak to your technique of
> > application. Unless you are using some very highly figured woods, or
> > some soft woods with a lot of grain challenges, your primer should be
> > applied at the same rate and the same thickness on the overall piece
> > in order to preserve the integrity of the final finish.
>
> > Many times the prime coat isn't smooth. However, if you are sanding
> > off more than nibs or a little bit of dust after you prime, you
> > probably should 1) sand more before you start finishing, and 2) make
> > sure you are finishing in a clean area.
>
> > In your case though, I am thinking the culprit is that you didn't
> > apply the primer evenly or at the right viscosity.
>
> > > >Should I put on a second thin coat of primer, or will > > the smoothness and solid
> > > > color come from 2 or more coats of lacquer?
>
> > A second coat probably won't hurt anything at all. I am hoping that
> > when you say "solid color" you are meaning "consistent" color. If you
> > are spraying piano black, red or white colored lacquer, you have
> > changed the game.
>
> > Assuming "solid" to be "consistent", you should consult the product
> > manufacturer for proper application thickness. They can help you with
> > your thinning procedures, and also tell you how thick to apply their
> > product when spraying. You final taget will probably be around 3 - 4
> > mil or so, maybe a little more.
>
> > You build that one coat at a time. Example: My favorite lacquer is
> > applied at a 4 mil coat with 10 - 15% thinning in moderate weather.
> > This dried down to only 1 mil thickness. So to get the manufacturer's
> > recommended final thickness, I spray another 2 - 3 coats.
>
> > > > Is one thin coat of primer enough for the lacquer to >
> > > > bond to?
>
> > Usually.
>
> > > > Also, I'm assuming that I need to sand the primer after > > it has dried.
> > > > Is that correct?
>
> > Depends. If my "off the gun" is good and I don't raise any grain, I
> > don't sand. Sanding raises dust, introduces particulates to the
> > surface of the work, and suspends dust in the air. Also, incorrect
> > sanding methods or just a sanding accident can introduce scratches and
> > swirls into the primer which will reflect into subsequent coats of
> > finish.
>
> > Additionally, there is no reason to sand lacquer for he purpose of
> > adhesion. It will build fine without any further surface prep.
>
> > Let us know how you do.
>
> > Robert- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
On Jun 4, 5:59 pm, "SonomaProducts.com" <[email protected]> wrote:
> This depends on your desired outcome.
>
> If you do not want the wood grain to telegraph through > the finish, then you must at least prime it with severl >coats sanded flat. Even the smoothest birch (or any) ply >will show the grain through the paint. This is what primer >can do for you and it's main purpose.
Are you saying that the main purpose of primer is as a pore filler to
hide grain?
>Even the smoothest birch (or any) ply
>will show the grain through the paint. This is what primer >can do for you and it's main purpose.
Now if you are switching to paint, I could see some benefit. I know
that a couple of good coats of Bull's Eye under a hard enamel will
really make a beautiful finish as it will mitigate the grain quite a
bit.
Robert
Primer can be used for several reasons such as making an even colored
under coat or lighter or darker undercoat for translucent or light
colored paints. Or to prevent the telegraphing of stains or sap or
mold into the paint. Or to provide a good adhesion where the paint
alone might not have the best properties to adhere.
However, in this case and in many cases primer is a thicker
consistencany than the paint an is used to smooth the surface.
This gent did use the word "lacquer" (although mispelled). Everyone
(or many) people here assumed it was clear lacquer like is most common
in wood projects. However, as was proven by his subsequent post, he is
using colored lacquer paint, as I assumed in my first post. He also
mentioned that he is using white. So I again assumed that 1. You don't
need a primer to help with color if you have Birch ply. White paint
will look fine over the nearly white Birch. 2. There is no adhesion
problem with wood. Therefore, the main (or only) reason a person might
want to use primer in this case is to smooth, fill pores, but more
than just fill pores in this case, primer is almost like a skim coat
of plaster or other similar material.
In automotive and motrocycles we used to use lacquer quite a bit. In
that case the primer was better at adhering to bare metal and it was
also totally used to flatten.
On Jun 4, 4:28 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Jun 4, 5:59 pm, "SonomaProducts.com" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This depends on your desired outcome.
>
> > If you do not want the wood grain to telegraph through > the finish, then you must at least prime it with severl >coats sanded flat. Even the smoothest birch (or any) ply >will show the grain through the paint. This is what primer >can do for you and it's main purpose.
>
> Are you saying that the main purpose of primer is as a pore filler to
> hide grain?
>
> >Even the smoothest birch (or any) ply
> >will show the grain through the paint. This is what primer >can do for you and it's main purpose.
>
> Now if you are switching to paint, I could see some benefit. I know
> that a couple of good coats of Bull's Eye under a hard enamel will
> really make a beautiful finish as it will mitigate the grain quite a
> bit.
>
> Robert
On Jun 5, 11:10 am, "SonomaProducts.com" <[email protected]> wrote:
SNIP of good verbage
> This gent did use the word "lacquer" (although mispelled). > Everyone (or many) people here assumed it was clear lacquer >like is most common in wood projects. However, as was proven >by his subsequent post, he is using colored lacquer paint, as I >assumed in my first post.
You're right. I sure missed it. Most of the finishers I know have
abandon colored lacquer and actually moved to modified paints. So I
automatically went to the clear stuff and said so in my post. And
for me when I shoot lacquer it is clear.
Thinking about it, I think the last black lacquer finish I applied was
for a guy that had me build his water bed furniture in tehhe 80s! It
was mirror black with gold plastic piping I had to groove and tap into
place. It was really cool then, but it has to look pretty cheesy by
today's design standards.
But I just finished some interior work for a client that had a baby
grand piano refinished due to roof leaks damaging the top. It was not
finished with the traditional black lacquer, but with a super hard
industrial black paint that was coated with a clear coats of a
modified lacquer of some sort. The top coats were then cut down and
buffed out as normal for a lacquer type of finish.
He laughed when I told him I thought everyone was using Pianolac. He
informed me almost no one was. What?!? Am I always the last to know?
Anyway, sounds like we are on the same page on the application of
primer and its use. I appreciate the well thought out answer as it
made it easier for me to understand what you were saying.
Robert