Sy

"Sammy"

20/10/2003 8:56 PM

Forrest WWII blade, Pt II...

OK, at the suggestion of someone, I called Forrest for their blade
recommendation, and here is what they said:

For the 1 1/2 HP saw, a thin kerf blade with a 5" stiffener.

Thanks for your help, all.



This topic has 7 replies

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to "Sammy" on 20/10/2003 8:56 PM

21/10/2003 1:37 AM

Thanks. Just dipsticking ... that was pretty well the general consensus of
the group, and also coincides with my experience with the WWII.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 9/21/03


"Sammy" wrote in message
> 40T is the GP blade.

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to "Sammy" on 20/10/2003 8:56 PM

20/10/2003 9:14 PM

That's good Sammy, but what was Forrest's answer to your original question?

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 9/21/03

"Sammy" wrote in message
> OK, at the suggestion of someone, I called Forrest for their blade
> recommendation, and here is what they said:
>
> For the 1 1/2 HP saw, a thin kerf blade with a 5" stiffener.
>
> Thanks for your help, all.

TT

Test Tickle

in reply to "Sammy" on 20/10/2003 8:56 PM

21/10/2003 12:39 AM

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:18:53 GMT, "Frank Ketchum"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>"Sammy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> OK, at the suggestion of someone, I called Forrest for their blade
>> recommendation, and here is what they said:
>>
>> For the 1 1/2 HP saw, a thin kerf blade with a 5" stiffener.
>>
>> Thanks for your help, all.
>>
>
>Sammy
>
>FWIW, I have the 1 1/2 hp Ridgid TS2424 and I have a regular kerf WWII. I
>havn't had any problems with it and I have used it to cut 8/4 hard maple.
>Keep in mind that if you do go with the blade stiffener, you will not be
>able to raise the blade to the same height as without it. Your maximum
>depth of cut is lowered.
>
>Frank
>

All of my tools are underpowered, and I find the thin kerf blades are
a godsend. As far as using stiffeners, you should try them both with
and without. One of my saws does great with a stiffener, but another
cuts better without them.

tt

MC

Mike Coonrod

in reply to "Sammy" on 20/10/2003 8:56 PM

21/10/2003 7:47 AM

You say at the end of your reply that one saw works better without
"them" You're just suppost to use one, right?

I have one on my WWII and I got the recommended (one) stiffern.

Test Tickle wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:18:53 GMT, "Frank Ketchum"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>"Sammy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>
>>>OK, at the suggestion of someone, I called Forrest for their blade
>>>recommendation, and here is what they said:
>>>
>>>For the 1 1/2 HP saw, a thin kerf blade with a 5" stiffener.
>>>
>>>Thanks for your help, all.
>>>
>>
>>Sammy
>>
>>FWIW, I have the 1 1/2 hp Ridgid TS2424 and I have a regular kerf WWII. I
>>havn't had any problems with it and I have used it to cut 8/4 hard maple.
>>Keep in mind that if you do go with the blade stiffener, you will not be
>>able to raise the blade to the same height as without it. Your maximum
>>depth of cut is lowered.
>>
>>Frank
>>
>
>
> All of my tools are underpowered, and I find the thin kerf blades are
> a godsend. As far as using stiffeners, you should try them both with
> and without. One of my saws does great with a stiffener, but another
> cuts better without them.
>
> tt

FK

"Frank Ketchum"

in reply to "Sammy" on 20/10/2003 8:56 PM

20/10/2003 10:18 PM


"Sammy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> OK, at the suggestion of someone, I called Forrest for their blade
> recommendation, and here is what they said:
>
> For the 1 1/2 HP saw, a thin kerf blade with a 5" stiffener.
>
> Thanks for your help, all.
>

Sammy

FWIW, I have the 1 1/2 hp Ridgid TS2424 and I have a regular kerf WWII. I
havn't had any problems with it and I have used it to cut 8/4 hard maple.
Keep in mind that if you do go with the blade stiffener, you will not be
able to raise the blade to the same height as without it. Your maximum
depth of cut is lowered.

Frank

Sy

"Sammy"

in reply to "Sammy" on 20/10/2003 8:56 PM

21/10/2003 12:18 AM

40T is the GP blade.

"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> That's good Sammy, but what was Forrest's answer to your original
question?
>
> --
> www.e-woodshop.net
> Last update: 9/21/03
>
> "Sammy" wrote in message
> > OK, at the suggestion of someone, I called Forrest for their blade
> > recommendation, and here is what they said:
> >
> > For the 1 1/2 HP saw, a thin kerf blade with a 5" stiffener.
> >
> > Thanks for your help, all.
>
>

TT

Test Tickle

in reply to "Sammy" on 20/10/2003 8:56 PM

22/10/2003 3:38 PM

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 07:47:39 -0500, Mike Coonrod <[email protected]> wrote:

>You say at the end of your reply that one saw works better without
>"them" You're just suppost to use one, right?
>
>I have one on my WWII and I got the recommended (one) stiffern.
>

Sorry. There are actually two types that I have used. One consists of
a single disc, with a rubber-gasket type thingy, and the other is a
pair of thinner metal plates of larger diameter. I suppose I just
should have proposed that you not assume the saw will cut smoother
with stiffener(s), but experimenting will be worth your while.

tt


You’ve reached the end of replies