"Bruce Carpenter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Woodchuck Bill <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> > bay area dave <[email protected]> wrote in
> > news:[email protected]:
> >
> > > EPIPHANY! :)
> > >
> > > your turn.
> >
> > Done. Truce.
>
> Why don't the two of you go get a hotel room and fuck.
>
> Have you seen Dave's photo?
>
> http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/2848/bad2.jpg
Getting a bit old now Brucey baby.
You're becoming more of a pain in the arse than Dave could ever HOPE to be.
On 4 Jun 2004 02:11:21 GMT, Woodchuck Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hell, I go away for a few days, come back, and find Bay Area Dave under a
> new "hard to filter" identity...first I thought someone was spoofing him
> again, but then I checked and the IP is his. To think, I almost felt sorry
> for him when someone posted his real name in here last week.
It only feeds the troll's attention-seeking when people quote him;
it's even more so when people start threads about him.
Woodchuck Bill <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> bay area dave <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]:
>
> > EPIPHANY! :)
> >
> > your turn.
>
> Done. Truce.
Why don't the two of you go get a hotel room and fuck.
Have you seen Dave's photo?
http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/2848/bad2.jpg
bay area dave <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
<snip>
> if I can't
> remember the details, the details aren't worth re-hashing.
> EPIPHANY! :)
Say, how'd you like to be my new CIA director?
Signed,
George Bush Jr.
Woodchuck Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hell, I go away for a few days, come back, and find Bay Area Dave under a
> new "hard to filter" identity...first I thought someone was spoofing him
...
Don't you guys spend a lot of time and energy worrying about this
endless pissing contest? Seems to me that y'all would be a lot
happier if you were to go out and make a little bit of sawdust. Just
an observation, of course.
LOL!
dave
Hylourgos wrote:
> bay area dave <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> <snip>
>
>>if I can't
>>remember the details, the details aren't worth re-hashing.
>>EPIPHANY! :)
>
>
> Say, how'd you like to be my new CIA director?
>
> Signed,
> George Bush Jr.
why don't you just come right out and tell the OP he can't
post anything YOU don't approve of??
DAVE
Dave Hinz wrote:
> On 4 Jun 2004 02:11:21 GMT, Woodchuck Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Hell, I go away for a few days, come back, and find Bay Area Dave under a
>>new "hard to filter" identity...first I thought someone was spoofing him
>>again, but then I checked and the IP is his. To think, I almost felt sorry
>>for him when someone posted his real name in here last week.
>
>
> It only feeds the troll's attention-seeking when people quote him;
> it's even more so when people start threads about him.
>
bay area dave <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> it's me, woodchucker. YOU feel sorry for ME?? That's a
> first. You follow me around to other newsgroups for
> harassment and NOW you almost "felt sorry for me". Why do I
> doubt your sincerity?
Nonsense. We both subscribe to rec.woodworking and rec.photo.digital as
well. So does Charlie Self. These were the two groups where the the whole
"doggie" thing happened. There was no following going on. Don't flatter
yourself. I am heavily into digital photography. Should you ever need any
advice, don't hesitate to ask me (like if you need someone to explain to
you the difference between sharpness and selective depth of field ;-) ).
I did feel a bit of sympathy when that person revealed (what he claimed to
be) your real name last week. Yes, I like to tease you, as do others, and
as you like to do to some people in here like you do to JOAT. Don't be so
damned sensitive, Homer. It's not like you don't dish it out to people too.
What did I say about you that was so terrible? Nothing out of the ordinary.
Others have said much worse about you. But to see you really lose it with
the blatant flooding of the NG was really really weird. At least you fessed
up to it.
If you offer Charlie, and anyone else you ever teased in this group an
apology, I will glad offer one to you, if you really feel that you need it.
--
Bill
bay area dave <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> {Why can I predict with 100 percent certainty, your response??)
I just noticed this part of your reply. Was your prediction correct? Or did
you expect "Fuck you, doggie" in response? ;-)
--
Bill
Woodchuck Bill responds:
>bay area dave <[email protected]> wrote in
>news:[email protected]:
>
>> {Why can I predict with 100 percent certainty, your response??)
>
>I just noticed this part of your reply. Was your prediction correct? Or did
>you expect "Fuck you, doggie" in response? ;-)
It was a response to someone else, in rec.photo.digital, not here, and not to
him. He brought it here to complain of my use of an Anglo-Saxon word with
Scandanavian roots because he thought it would create a fuss, which,
unfortunately, it has.
Charlie Self
"The test and the use of man's education is that he finds pleasure in the
exercise of his mind." Jacques Barzun
[email protected] (Charlie Self) wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> Woodchuck Bill responds:
>
>>bay area dave <[email protected]> wrote in
>>news:[email protected]:
>>
>>> {Why can I predict with 100 percent certainty, your response??)
>>
>>I just noticed this part of your reply. Was your prediction correct?
>>Or did you expect "Fuck you, doggie" in response? ;-)
>
> It was a response to someone else, in rec.photo.digital, not here, and
> not to him. He brought it here to complain of my use of an Anglo-Saxon
> word with Scandanavian roots because he thought it would create a
> fuss, which, unfortunately, it has.
> Charlie Self
> "The test and the use of man's education is that he finds pleasure in
> the exercise of his mind." Jacques Barzun
I was just joking, Charlie. I was totally on your side during that whole
scandal. For the sake of the group, and just being an adult, I've buried
the hatchet with Dave.
--
Bill
Fri, Jun 4, 2004, 12:22pm (EDT+4) [email protected] (Woodchuck=A0Bill)
dreams on:
<snip> For the sake of the group, and just being an adult, I've buried
the hatchet with Dave.
To have a gentlemen's agreement, requires all parties in it to be
gentlemen. He who must not be named is not one. Your "agreement" will
therefore last only as long as he chooses. Same thing he pulled with me
awhile back.
But, I suppose his behaviour is only partially his fault. Seems he
didn't feel he needed to bother sending any sacrifices for the
Woodworking Gods. That pretty much ticked them off. So, they put a
stupid curse on him.
As you can see, the curse worked.
Made him stupider.
LMAO
JOAT
If you're offered free wood, take it, period; figure out what to use it
for later.
- JOAT
Woodchuck Bill <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> [email protected] (J T) wrote:
>
> > Fri, Jun 4, 2004, 12:22pm (EDT+4) [email protected] (Woodchuck Bill)
> > dreams on:
>
> > <snip> For the sake of the group, and just being an adult, I've buried
> > the hatchet with Dave.
> >
> > To have a gentlemen's agreement, requires all parties in it to be
> > gentlemen. He who must not be named is not one. Your "agreement" will
> > therefore last only as long as he chooses. Same thing he pulled with me
> > awhile back.
> >
> > But, I suppose his behaviour is only partially his fault. Seems he
> > didn't feel he needed to bother sending any sacrifices for the
> > Woodworking Gods. That pretty much ticked them off. So, they put a
> > stupid curse on him.
> >
> > As you can see, the curse worked.
> >
> > Made him stupider.
> >
> > LMAO
>
> Thanks for the advice, JOAT. I know you and Dave have had your battles too,
> but I reckon it's best if I keep up with my end of the bargain. If he
> decides to start up the old flame war again, at least I will have done my
> part.
You and Dave should go get a motel room and fuck.
Have you seen the recent photo of Dave's bitch?
http://www.valley-girl.net/shepost3/urj5c030.jpg
not to worry; I'm a man of my word, regardless of what
strangers might think. If I say I've buried the hatchet,
then you can "take that to the bank". I have every reason
to believe you'll do the same. (read: I trust you)
dave
Woodchuck Bill wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the advice, JOAT. I know you and Dave have had your battles too,
> but I reckon it's best if I keep up with my end of the bargain. If he
> decides to start up the old flame war again, at least I will have done my
> part.
>
seems to me YOU are the one hurling insults these days.
What have I done TO you lately??? Don't anticipate problems
that may never occur. I just reviewed my posts to you on
"there wouldn't be much..." thread and found nary a
demeaning word hurled your way. OTOH, you just called me
"stupider". sheesh!
dave
dave.
J T wrote:
> Fri, Jun 4, 2004, 12:22pm (EDT+4) [email protected] (Woodchuck Bill)
> dreams on:
> <snip> For the sake of the group, and just being an adult, I've buried
> the hatchet with Dave.
>
> To have a gentlemen's agreement, requires all parties in it to be
> gentlemen. He who must not be named is not one. Your "agreement" will
> therefore last only as long as he chooses. Same thing he pulled with me
> awhile back.
>
> But, I suppose his behaviour is only partially his fault. Seems he
> didn't feel he needed to bother sending any sacrifices for the
> Woodworking Gods. That pretty much ticked them off. So, they put a
> stupid curse on him.
>
> As you can see, the curse worked.
>
> Made him stupider.
>
> LMAO
>
> JOAT
> If you're offered free wood, take it, period; figure out what to use it
> for later.
> - JOAT
>
Sun, Jun 6, 2004, 1:51am (EDT+4) [email protected] (bay=A0area=A0dave)
burbled:
seems to me YOU are the one hurling insults these days. What have I done
TO you lately???
Time restraints on responses to you now? You never said.
Selective memory also. You did include my handle in one of your recent
responses to a thread. A thread to which I still have not posted.
Don't anticipate problems that may never occur. I just reviewed my posts
to you on "there wouldn't be much..." thread and found nary a demeaning
word hurled your way.
See the above. I don't want you putting me in any of your posts,
period. If you don't, you will certainlly not get any from me.
OTOH, you just called me "stupider". sheesh!
Indeed? I thought I had made a comment to someone else. I believe
I didn't mention anyone's name either.
But, if the shoe fits, bite it.
JOAT
If you're offered free wood, take it, period; figure out what to use it
for later.
- JOAT
[email protected] (J T) wrote:
> Fri, Jun 4, 2004, 12:22pm (EDT+4) [email protected] (Woodchuck Bill)
> dreams on:
> <snip> For the sake of the group, and just being an adult, I've buried
> the hatchet with Dave.
>
> To have a gentlemen's agreement, requires all parties in it to be
> gentlemen. He who must not be named is not one. Your "agreement" will
> therefore last only as long as he chooses. Same thing he pulled with me
> awhile back.
>
> But, I suppose his behaviour is only partially his fault. Seems he
> didn't feel he needed to bother sending any sacrifices for the
> Woodworking Gods. That pretty much ticked them off. So, they put a
> stupid curse on him.
>
> As you can see, the curse worked.
>
> Made him stupider.
>
> LMAO
Thanks for the advice, JOAT. I know you and Dave have had your battles too,
but I reckon it's best if I keep up with my end of the bargain. If he
decides to start up the old flame war again, at least I will have done my
part.
--
Bill
bay area dave <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> EPIPHANY! :)
>
> your turn.
Done. Truce.
--
Bill
:) good one!
dave
Woodchuck Bill wrote:
> bay area dave <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]:
>
>
>>{Why can I predict with 100 percent certainty, your response??)
>
>
> I just noticed this part of your reply. Was your prediction correct? Or did
> you expect "F*ck you, doggie" in response? ;-)
>
first point: fair enough. you are right; you read the other
newsgroup too.
Teasing is FINE. absolutely. it's actually a preference of
mine. But concerted efforts to ostracize and humiliate are
NOT teasing. I have zero respect for men who run in packs.
well, NO, I don't NEED an apology. I'm hoping YOU will take
the high road and NOT predicate any apology to me on my
apologizing to anyone else. That's up to the other party to
suggest. It isn't YOUR place to tell ME who to apologize
to, except for yourself. Do you see my point? YOU are not
the designated "enforcer" to issue edicts about what I
should write to other participants. Those who feel their
feelings have been damaged should come to ME like a man, and
tell me specifically what beef they have.
I'm actually willing to let go of whatever issues I've had
with your earlier posts. I did a Google, and realized that
rather than waste my time reading, I figured if I can't
remember the details, the details aren't worth re-hashing.
EPIPHANY! :)
your turn.
dave
Woodchuck Bill wrote:
> bay area dave <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]:
>
>
>>it's me, woodchucker. YOU feel sorry for ME?? That's a
>>first. You follow me around to other newsgroups for
>>harassment and NOW you almost "felt sorry for me". Why do I
>>doubt your sincerity?
>
>
> Nonsense. We both subscribe to rec.woodworking and rec.photo.digital as
> well. So does Charlie Self. These were the two groups where the the whole
> "doggie" thing happened. There was no following going on. Don't flatter
> yourself. I am heavily into digital photography. Should you ever need any
> advice, don't hesitate to ask me (like if you need someone to explain to
> you the difference between sharpness and selective depth of field ;-) ).
>
> I did feel a bit of sympathy when that person revealed (what he claimed to
> be) your real name last week. Yes, I like to tease you, as do others, and
> as you like to do to some people in here like you do to JOAT. Don't be so
> damned sensitive, Homer. It's not like you don't dish it out to people too.
>
> What did I say about you that was so terrible? Nothing out of the ordinary.
> Others have said much worse about you. But to see you really lose it with
> the blatant flooding of the NG was really really weird. At least you fessed
> up to it.
>
> If you offer Charlie, and anyone else you ever teased in this group an
> apology, I will glad offer one to you, if you really feel that you need it.
>
it's me, woodchucker. YOU feel sorry for ME?? That's a
first. You follow me around to other newsgroups for
harassment and NOW you almost "felt sorry for me". Why do I
doubt your sincerity?
When you want to cease and desist with the harassment, AND
issue an apology, I'll treat you with respect. Until then
I'm as wary as ever when I see your moniker. Ball's in your
court, man.
{Why can I predict with 100 percent certainty, your response??)
dave
Woodchuck Bill wrote:
> Hell, I go away for a few days, come back, and find Bay Area Dave under a
> new "hard to filter" identity...first I thought someone was spoofing him
> again, but then I checked and the IP is his. To think, I almost felt sorry
> for him when someone posted his real name in here last week.
>
deal.
dave
Woodchuck Bill wrote:
> bay area dave <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]:
>
>
>>EPIPHANY! :)
>>
>>your turn.
>
>
> Done. Truce.
>