Let me go on record as saying that I am in favor of the former but
lack D.A.'s fondness for the latter.
DucksAss has strafed us with this pretentious crap before.
If he thinks that he can impress us by dropping the appropriate
article (be it definite or, more appropriately, indefinite) from its
needed position at the fore of the specious non-term, 'living trade',
well, we've seen this kinda crap before - and I figger we ain't
impressed.
DucksAss tried this in alt.sociology a while back and they was
similarly lacking in enthusiasm.
(watson - who got his master's in philosophy about a million years ago
and has heard better thetical expression from the frosh rubes that he
was once charged with - way better.)
Regards,
Tom.
Thomas J.Watson - Cabinetmaker (ret.)
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
On Fri, 21 May 2004 20:16:50 -0400, Tom Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip>
>
>(watson - who got his master's in philosophy about a million years ago
>and has heard better thetical expression from the frosh rubes that he
>was once charged with - way better.)
>
(watson - who has forced me to bookmark an online dictionary - and I _thought_ I had a fairly large vocabulary)
Tom Veatch
Wichita, KS USA
On Sat, 22 May 2004 02:58:20 GMT, Bay Area Dave <[email protected]>
wrote:
>losing your grip on the English language again, Tommy?
>Review your sentence that starts with "Ducksass" and tell me
>what grammatical error you committed. No cheating. Don't
>get a fellow miscreant to whisper the answer in your ear...
>
>dave
>
>Tom Watson wrote:
>> DucksAss tried this in alt.sociology a while back and they was
>> similarly lacking in enthusiasm.
Ya know boy, you are dumber than snot.
Guys like youse and LJ prolly spent your youth trying to correct the
'grammatical errors' in Pogo and insisting that the lyrics of the song
beez changed to, 'Bess, you ARE my woman now.'
Regards,
Tom.
Thomas J.Watson - Cabinetmaker (ret.)
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
Plonk !
"D. A. Clark" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Well, Tom, I did appreciate the poem. It expressed real
> understanding; but, you seem to have lost yours along the
> way...somewhere.
> Duck's Ass...lol...how about Devil's Advocate? Unfortunately, the
> only thing that seems to get a response, around here, is a taste of
> their own bitter medicine...then the blood comes up.
> And, who knows, we might learn something.
Tom Watson <[email protected]> wrote in message
from mediocrity to mediocrity...eh, Watson?
Well, Tom, I did appreciate the poem. It expressed real
understanding; but, you seem to have lost yours along the
way...somewhere.
Duck's Ass...lol...how about Devil's Advocate? Unfortunately, the
only thing that seems to get a response, around here, is a taste of
their own bitter medicine...then the blood comes up.
And, who knows, we might learn something.
"D. A. Clark" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Well, Tom, I did appreciate the poem. It expressed real
> understanding; but, you seem to have lost yours along the
> way...somewhere.
> Duck's Ass...lol...how about Devil's Advocate? Unfortunately, the
> only thing that seems to get a response, around here, is a taste of
> their own bitter medicine...then the blood comes up.
> And, who knows, we might learn something.
And of course the preferred method of instruction is to walk in and
immediately insult your students. You know (obviously)--call them clueless,
stupid, etc. Gains their respect right at the get go.
that's the BEST rejoinder you can manage these days?? Boy,
are you SLIPPING, TW. I expected more originality than
"dumber than snot". You must have already uttered all the
witty comebacks you'll ever manage, kinda like current music
sucks! All the good music has already been written and
performed. Current music is SOOOO boring...like you in 2004.
dave
Tom Watson wrote:
> On Sat, 22 May 2004 02:58:20 GMT, Bay Area Dave <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>losing your grip on the English language again, Tommy?
>>Review your sentence that starts with "Ducksass" and tell me
>>what grammatical error you committed. No cheating. Don't
>>get a fellow miscreant to whisper the answer in your ear...
>>
>>dave
>>
>>Tom Watson wrote:
>
>
>>>DucksAss tried this in alt.sociology a while back and they was
>>>similarly lacking in enthusiasm.
>
>
> Ya know boy, you are dumber than snot.
>
> Guys like youse and LJ prolly spent your youth trying to correct the
> 'grammatical errors' in Pogo and insisting that the lyrics of the song
> beez changed to, 'Bess, you ARE my woman now.'
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Tom.
>
> Thomas J.Watson - Cabinetmaker (ret.)
> tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
> http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
I missed the post than caused all the rancor towards D.A.
Without wasting TOO much of your time, can you give me a
quicky synopsis of his transgressions or a link to his
post(s). Thanks!
dave
Mike Marlow wrote:
> Bob Schmall wrote:
>
>>"D. A. Clark" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>
>>>Well, Tom, I did appreciate the poem. It expressed real
>>>understanding; but, you seem to have lost yours along the
>>>way...somewhere.
>>>Duck's Ass...lol...how about Devil's Advocate? Unfortunately, the
>>>only thing that seems to get a response, around here, is a taste of
>>>their own bitter medicine...then the blood comes up.
>>>And, who knows, we might learn something.
>>
>>And of course the preferred method of instruction is to walk in and
>>immediately insult your students. You know (obviously)--call them
>>clueless, stupid, etc. Gains their respect right at the get go.
>
>
> Not to mention the condesension that implies those students need to learn
> something from the orator..
"Tom Watson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 22 May 2004 19:35:29 GMT, Bay Area Dave <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >that's the BEST rejoinder you can manage these days?? Boy,
> >are you SLIPPING, TW. I expected more originality than
> >"dumber than snot". You must have already uttered all the
> >witty comebacks you'll ever manage, kinda like current music
> >sucks! All the good music has already been written and
> >performed. Current music is SOOOO boring...like you in 2004.
> >
>
> You're a verbal coprophile, boy dave.
>
> I've given you the good shit already.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Tom.
Autocoprophagous it is, Tom
you need to stop quoting others and rely on your own words.
dave
Tom Watson wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2004 00:02:57 GMT, Bay Area Dave <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>hmmm... and YOU sound less and less like yourself lately...
>
>
>>>"Give a moment or two to the angry young man,
>>>With his foot in his mouth and his heart in his hand.
>>>He's been stabbed in the back, he's been misunderstood,
>>>It's a comfort to know his intentions are good.
>>>And he sits in a room with a lock on the door,
>>>With his maps and his medals laid out on the floor-
>>>And he likes to be known as the angry young man."
>
>
> Billy Joel, c. Twentieth Century
>
>
> and this is way too good for a pos such as yourself.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Tom.
>
> Thomas J.Watson - Cabinetmaker (ret.)
> tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
> http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
hmmm... and YOU sound less and less like yourself lately...
dave
Tom Watson wrote:
> On Sat, 22 May 2004 19:37:37 GMT, Bay Area Dave <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>I missed the post than caused all the rancor towards D.A.
>>Without wasting TOO much of your time, can you give me a
>>quicky synopsis of his transgressions or a link to his
>>post(s). Thanks!
>>
>
>
> He sounds more or less like you.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Tom.
>
> Thomas J.Watson - Cabinetmaker (ret.)
> tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
> http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
Bob Schmall wrote:
> "D. A. Clark" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Well, Tom, I did appreciate the poem. It expressed real
>> understanding; but, you seem to have lost yours along the
>> way...somewhere.
>> Duck's Ass...lol...how about Devil's Advocate? Unfortunately, the
>> only thing that seems to get a response, around here, is a taste of
>> their own bitter medicine...then the blood comes up.
>> And, who knows, we might learn something.
>
> And of course the preferred method of instruction is to walk in and
> immediately insult your students. You know (obviously)--call them
> clueless, stupid, etc. Gains their respect right at the get go.
Not to mention the condesension that implies those students need to learn
something from the orator..
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
"Bob Schmall" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Tom Watson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > You're a verbal coprophile, boy dave.
> >
> > I've given you the good shit already.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tom.
>
> Autocoprophagous it is, Tom
Will you guys PLEASE put away those &*(^%^#$%^&^ UNABRIDGED dictionaries?
My pocket version got lost waaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy back.
--
Nahmie
The first myth of management is that management exists.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 5/18/2004
"Tom Veatch" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 23 May 2004 00:33:47 -0400, "Norman D. Crow" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>
> >Will you guys PLEASE put away those &*(^%^#$%^&^ UNABRIDGED dictionaries?
> >
> >My pocket version got lost waaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy back.
>
> Nahmie,
>
> When it gets this deep, I find the following link to be of benefit
>
> http://www.bartleby.com/61/
Tendjewberrymosh!
--
Nahmie
The first myth of management is that management exists.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 5/18/2004
losing your grip on the English language again, Tommy?
Review your sentence that starts with "Ducksass" and tell me
what grammatical error you committed. No cheating. Don't
get a fellow miscreant to whisper the answer in your ear...
dave
Tom Watson wrote:
> Let me go on record as saying that I am in favor of the former but
> lack D.A.'s fondness for the latter.
>
> DucksAss has strafed us with this pretentious crap before.
>
> If he thinks that he can impress us by dropping the appropriate
> article (be it definite or, more appropriately, indefinite) from its
> needed position at the fore of the specious non-term, 'living trade',
> well, we've seen this kinda crap before - and I figger we ain't
> impressed.
>
> DucksAss tried this in alt.sociology a while back and they was
> similarly lacking in enthusiasm.
>
>
> (watson - who got his master's in philosophy about a million years ago
> and has heard better thetical expression from the frosh rubes that he
> was once charged with - way better.)
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Tom.
>
> Thomas J.Watson - Cabinetmaker (ret.)
> tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
> http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
On Sun, 23 May 2004 00:33:47 -0400, "Norman D. Crow" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Will you guys PLEASE put away those &*(^%^#$%^&^ UNABRIDGED dictionaries?
>
>My pocket version got lost waaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy back.
Nahmie,
When it gets this deep, I find the following link to be of benefit
http://www.bartleby.com/61/
I wound up bookmarking it.
Tom Veatch
Wichita, KS USA
follow the leader, sycophantic BS, is more like it.
dave
Bob Schmall wrote:
> "Tom Watson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>On Sat, 22 May 2004 19:35:29 GMT, Bay Area Dave <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>that's the BEST rejoinder you can manage these days?? Boy,
>>>are you SLIPPING, TW. I expected more originality than
>>>"dumber than snot". You must have already uttered all the
>>>witty comebacks you'll ever manage, kinda like current music
>>>sucks! All the good music has already been written and
>>>performed. Current music is SOOOO boring...like you in 2004.
>>>
>>
>>You're a verbal coprophile, boy dave.
>>
>>I've given you the good shit already.
>>
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>Tom.
>
>
> Autocoprophagous it is, Tom
>
>
>
On Sat, 22 May 2004 19:37:37 GMT, Bay Area Dave <[email protected]>
wrote:
>I missed the post than caused all the rancor towards D.A.
>Without wasting TOO much of your time, can you give me a
>quicky synopsis of his transgressions or a link to his
>post(s). Thanks!
>
He sounds more or less like you.
Regards,
Tom.
Thomas J.Watson - Cabinetmaker (ret.)
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
On Sat, 22 May 2004 19:35:29 GMT, Bay Area Dave <[email protected]>
wrote:
>that's the BEST rejoinder you can manage these days?? Boy,
>are you SLIPPING, TW. I expected more originality than
>"dumber than snot". You must have already uttered all the
>witty comebacks you'll ever manage, kinda like current music
>sucks! All the good music has already been written and
>performed. Current music is SOOOO boring...like you in 2004.
>
You're a verbal coprophile, boy dave.
I've given you the good shit already.
Regards,
Tom.
Thomas J.Watson - Cabinetmaker (ret.)
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
On Sun, 23 May 2004 00:02:57 GMT, Bay Area Dave <[email protected]>
wrote:
>hmmm... and YOU sound less and less like yourself lately...
>>"Give a moment or two to the angry young man,
>>With his foot in his mouth and his heart in his hand.
>>He's been stabbed in the back, he's been misunderstood,
>>It's a comfort to know his intentions are good.
>>And he sits in a room with a lock on the door,
>>With his maps and his medals laid out on the floor-
>>And he likes to be known as the angry young man."
Billy Joel, c. Twentieth Century
and this is way too good for a pos such as yourself.
Regards,
Tom.
Thomas J.Watson - Cabinetmaker (ret.)
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
On 22 May 2004 00:17:58 -0700, [email protected] (D. A. Clark)
wrote:
>Tom Watson <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
>from mediocrity to mediocrity...eh, Watson?
That's pretty much my read on it, DucksAss.
Regards,
Tom.
Thomas J.Watson - Cabinetmaker (ret.)
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
let me run that through my Enigma. Translation to follow...
dave
Tom Watson wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2004 01:19:43 GMT, Bay Area Dave <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>you need to stop quoting others and rely on your own words.
>
>
> ?p???µ? ?t? ?a µp????sa ?a sa? s??a?t?s?, ?ts? ?ste ?a µp??? ?a
> ???ts?s? t? ???ße?? ???d??? sa?.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Tom.
>
> Thomas J.Watson - Cabinetmaker (ret.)
> tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
> http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
Please focus all your time on decoding Tom's message
and let us know the result when you've succeeded.
Inquiring minds want to know and would be very
appreciative of your efforts.
In the event you cannot locate your enigma ...
There are several SW simulators on this site, as well as an
Electronic Enigma Replica which you could build if you
have the requisite skills.
http://www.xat.nl/enigma/
Art
"Bay Area Dave" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> let me run that through my Enigma. Translation to follow...
>
> dave
On Sun, 23 May 2004 01:19:43 GMT, Bay Area Dave <[email protected]>
wrote:
>you need to stop quoting others and rely on your own words.
?p???µ? ?t? ?a µp????sa ?a sa? s??a?t?s?, ?ts? ?ste ?a µp??? ?a
???ts?s? t? ???ße?? ???d??? sa?.
Regards,
Tom.
Thomas J.Watson - Cabinetmaker (ret.)
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
On Sat, 22 May 2004 17:09:59 -0400, Tom Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
>You're a verbal coprophile, boy dave.
>
>I've given you the good shit already.
>
>
Damn, back to the dictionary ('though I _think_ I got that one figured out from context)
Tom Veatch
Wichita, KS USA