Hey all: I'v got a detached garage/shop that has a separate 100 amp sub
panel. I'm wiring from the sub panel to the individual outlets in the
shop. I wanted to run 3 separate 20 amp circuits of 12AWG THHN stranded
wire in a single piece of exposed 1/2" EMT (conduit), and figured I'd
have to run 3 sets of 3 wires each that would likely put me over the 40%
fill limit. I called the city inspector and he said that don't have to
run 9 wires down the conduit, I can instead run 3 common's, two
neutral's (1 for each phase, 1 of which will be shared by 2 circuits),
and use the conduit as the ground. That would be 5 wires total run in
the tube.
From the information I've gotten to this point, this is wrong. I'm
skeptical of 2 breakers sharing 1 neutral, and of the EMT
providing the only equipment ground. However I'm just a 1 man shop so
I'm only running 1 tool on 1 circuit at a time.
Does anyone have a copy of the 2002 NEC that would clarify this? I have
the Illustrated guide the NEC in front of me, but it assumes that you
also have the actual NEC book to reference, so it's sort of like reading
every other paragraph in a novel.
Thank you for any advice: Dean
run the ground wire
if it isn't already run, run 3/4"... a week from now you will want
another circuit.
2 - 110 circuits on one neutral is not a problem, as long as the 2 hot
wire are on different phases, otherwise you could overload the neutral.
BRuce
Greg wrote:
> >I can instead run 3 common's, two
>
>>neutral's (1 for each phase, 1 of which will be shared by 2 circuits),
>>and use the conduit as the ground. That would be 5 wires total run in
>>the tube.
>
>
> That will work. I agree with the suggestion of using a 2 pole breaker for the
> multiwire circuit (shared neutral) I would also use different colors for the
> hots on that run (red/blue?) so you won't get them confused later.
> Since 9 #12 is max for 1/2" EMT you still have room for a green wire ground. I
> would certainly do that. You only need one.
> The reality is you can run 3 hots, 3 neutrals and one ground. That is still
> only 7.
>
> Buy a bottle of pulling lub. You will appreciate it when you start pulling in
> the wires. It works better than all the makeshift solutions and it won't hurt
> the wire.
>
>
>
>if it isn't already run, run 3/4"... a week from now you will want
>another circuit.
>
He will start bumping up against derating problems if he gets more than 6
current carrying conductors in the pipe. As it is the 90c THHN will compensate
for the 80% derating factor (4-6) and still allow him to stay with #12. This is
one place where multiwire circuits do help. You don't derate a shared neutral.
310.15(B)(4).
you are welcome and I do understand. if you ever need to add additional
circuits the wire will be reusable.
the reason I recommend using the ground wire is that the "fit" of EMT is
somewhat loose and you are relying on a steel screw for continuity,
these screws rust over time and the ground becomes more resistive.
I've seen it both ways, from experience I always run the wire.
BRuce
dean b wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "anthony diodati" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Sounds like a multi-wire circuit.
>>That should Be OK.
>>I believe there should be a tie on the or a double pole breaker , and of
>>course, each half of the breaker needs to catch oposite sides of the buss's.
>
>
> Thank you for all the responses: I hadn't thought at all about the
> phase of 2 circuits sharing 1 neutral but I think I understand now. One
> phase is 180 degrees off of the other so if you were looking at 2 "sine
> waves" the peaks would be the reverse of one another?
> I'll go ahead and use the EMT as the ground as I have only 2 very
> manageable short runs. 3 circuits in one, 2 in the other.
> And to BRuce: I originally wanted to run 3/4" EMT but my suppliers
> (HD/Menards), wanted over twice the component cost of 1/2",
> (handi-boxes, face plates, connecters), so I went with 1/2".
> Again, thank you to all: Dean
--
---
BRuce
>I can instead run 3 common's, two
>neutral's (1 for each phase, 1 of which will be shared by 2 circuits),
>and use the conduit as the ground. That would be 5 wires total run in
>the tube.
That will work. I agree with the suggestion of using a 2 pole breaker for the
multiwire circuit (shared neutral) I would also use different colors for the
hots on that run (red/blue?) so you won't get them confused later.
Since 9 #12 is max for 1/2" EMT you still have room for a green wire ground. I
would certainly do that. You only need one.
The reality is you can run 3 hots, 3 neutrals and one ground. That is still
only 7.
Buy a bottle of pulling lub. You will appreciate it when you start pulling in
the wires. It works better than all the makeshift solutions and it won't hurt
the wire.
"anthony diodati" <[email protected]> writes:
>Sounds like a multi-wire circuit.
>That should Be OK.
>I believe there should be a tie on the or a double pole breaker , and of
>course, each half of the breaker needs to catch oposite sides of the buss's.
A tie shouldn't be required if this is wired as
the inspector suggested. A handle tie may be
used for safety purposes if both of the circuits
terminate in the same outlet box.
What the OP wants to do is run three 120v 20a circuits
through the same conduit. Two of the three hots
can share a single grounded conductor (aka neutral) if
the two hots are split across the two 240v legs. The
other hot should have a dedicated grounded conductor.
Note that the two current carrying conductors which
share the single grounded conductor should be of
equal length to the grounded conductor. Strangely
enough, in this configuration, if both of the 120v
circuits are equally loaded, the current flow
in the grounded conductor will be zero; since
the currents cancel, the worst case (with one
side fully loaded and the other with nothing),
the neutral will still only carry 20a.
EMT is suitable as a grounding conductor, but
flexible metal conduit is not, and a separate
grounding conductor must be pulled.
(hot leg - current carrying)
(grounded conductor - neutral)
(grounding conductor - ground)
scott
>
>"dean b" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> Hey all: I'v got a detached garage/shop that has a separate 100 amp sub
>> panel. I'm wiring from the sub panel to the individual outlets in the
>> shop. I wanted to run 3 separate 20 amp circuits of 12AWG THHN stranded
>> wire in a single piece of exposed 1/2" EMT (conduit), and figured I'd
>> have to run 3 sets of 3 wires each that would likely put me over the 40%
>> fill limit. I called the city inspector and he said that don't have to
>> run 9 wires down the conduit, I can instead run 3 common's, two
>> neutral's (1 for each phase, 1 of which will be shared by 2 circuits),
>> and use the conduit as the ground. That would be 5 wires total run in
>> the tube.
>> From the information I've gotten to this point, this is wrong. I'm
>> skeptical of 2 breakers sharing 1 neutral, and of the EMT
>> providing the only equipment ground. However I'm just a 1 man shop so
>> I'm only running 1 tool on 1 circuit at a time.
>> Does anyone have a copy of the 2002 NEC that would clarify this? I have
>> the Illustrated guide the NEC in front of me, but it assumes that you
>> also have the actual NEC book to reference, so it's sort of like reading
>> every other paragraph in a novel.
>> Thank you for any advice: Dean
>
>
In article <[email protected]>,
dean b <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hey all: I'v got a detached garage/shop that has a separate 100 amp sub
>panel. I'm wiring from the sub panel to the individual outlets in the
>shop. I wanted to run 3 separate 20 amp circuits of 12AWG THHN stranded
>wire in a single piece of exposed 1/2" EMT (conduit), and figured I'd
>have to run 3 sets of 3 wires each that would likely put me over the 40%
>fill limit. I called the city inspector and he said that don't have to
>run 9 wires down the conduit, I can instead run 3 common's, two
>neutral's (1 for each phase, 1 of which will be shared by 2 circuits),
>and use the conduit as the ground. That would be 5 wires total run in
>the tube.
>From the information I've gotten to this point, this is wrong. I'm
>skeptical of 2 breakers sharing 1 neutral, and of the EMT
>providing the only equipment ground. However I'm just a 1 man shop so
>I'm only running 1 tool on 1 circuit at a time.
>Does anyone have a copy of the 2002 NEC that would clarify this? I have
>the Illustrated guide the NEC in front of me, but it assumes that you
>also have the actual NEC book to reference, so it's sort of like reading
>every other paragraph in a novel.
>Thank you for any advice: Dean
The city said you can do it, which means that 'edison' wiring *is* legal
in your community.
There -may- be a 'difference in understanding' about "what kind of circuits"
are involved.
You _can_ run 2 separate *120V* circuits (as long as they're on different
'hot' sides of the 240V supply), with a single, shared, 'neutral'.
Note: for 120V wiring in EMT, you only need 1 'hot' (black or other color),
and 1 'neutral' (white) wire, the 'ground' ("green") _is_ handled through
the conduit.
In 'Edison' wiring, two 120V circuits, *on*separate*phases* , share a common
"return" (the neutral) which has to be only the same size as the largest
hot wire. This works because the _maximum_ load in the neutral is when
one hot is at capacity, and the other has -zero- load. Since the two
hot leads are out-of-phase with each other, any load on the 2nd hot results
in a *reduction* in the current flow in the neutral.
If you're talking about running 240V circuits, it's a whole nother ball-game.
Gotta have 2 'hot' wires (typically 'black' and 'red') for each circuit.
'safety ground' is still on the EMT. "Neutral" is -not- needed, *unless* you
have 240V equipment that has 'included' 120V components (like lights).
Note: you -cannot- 'share' that neutral between multiple 240V circuits.
In _either_ the situation of 3 120V circuits, or 3 240V-without-120V-option
circuits, you only need 6 wires to provide 'dedicated' wiring for each
circuit. "safety ground" is supplied by the EMT.
The only case you'd require 9 wires is running 3 240V circuits _with_ 120V
support on each circuit. In that situation, you've got 2 hots and a neutral
(that cannot be shared across 240 circuits) for _each_ circuit, with
'safety ground' being handled by the EMT.
Sounds like a multi-wire circuit.
That should Be OK.
I believe there should be a tie on the or a double pole breaker , and of
course, each half of the breaker needs to catch oposite sides of the buss's.
Post it over here
http://www.selfhelpforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=12
This guy(Warran) knows the code "By Heart"
And Check out there Main Page.
http://homewiringandmore.com/
Thanks, Tony D.
"dean b" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Hey all: I'v got a detached garage/shop that has a separate 100 amp sub
> panel. I'm wiring from the sub panel to the individual outlets in the
> shop. I wanted to run 3 separate 20 amp circuits of 12AWG THHN stranded
> wire in a single piece of exposed 1/2" EMT (conduit), and figured I'd
> have to run 3 sets of 3 wires each that would likely put me over the 40%
> fill limit. I called the city inspector and he said that don't have to
> run 9 wires down the conduit, I can instead run 3 common's, two
> neutral's (1 for each phase, 1 of which will be shared by 2 circuits),
> and use the conduit as the ground. That would be 5 wires total run in
> the tube.
> From the information I've gotten to this point, this is wrong. I'm
> skeptical of 2 breakers sharing 1 neutral, and of the EMT
> providing the only equipment ground. However I'm just a 1 man shop so
> I'm only running 1 tool on 1 circuit at a time.
> Does anyone have a copy of the 2002 NEC that would clarify this? I have
> the Illustrated guide the NEC in front of me, but it assumes that you
> also have the actual NEC book to reference, so it's sort of like reading
> every other paragraph in a novel.
> Thank you for any advice: Dean
In article <[email protected]>,
"anthony diodati" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sounds like a multi-wire circuit.
> That should Be OK.
> I believe there should be a tie on the or a double pole breaker , and of
> course, each half of the breaker needs to catch oposite sides of the buss's.
Thank you for all the responses: I hadn't thought at all about the
phase of 2 circuits sharing 1 neutral but I think I understand now. One
phase is 180 degrees off of the other so if you were looking at 2 "sine
waves" the peaks would be the reverse of one another?
I'll go ahead and use the EMT as the ground as I have only 2 very
manageable short runs. 3 circuits in one, 2 in the other.
And to BRuce: I originally wanted to run 3/4" EMT but my suppliers
(HD/Menards), wanted over twice the component cost of 1/2",
(handi-boxes, face plates, connecters), so I went with 1/2".
Again, thank you to all: Dean