Do not expect 690 performance nor excellence on any inside cut.
Do expect light duty work for short periods where there is no way to
get power.
Worth it? Perhaps, but if you have power at your side: Maybe not.
More on routers?
See http://www.patwarner.com
**********************************************
samson wrote:
> Has anyone tried one of these? Is it worth the money?
>
> Thanks,
>
> S.
I use it to do some initial pattern cuts when I do my poker tables (I cut
the bulk outside when its nice)
anyways - works fine - I maybe use it for 10-20 mins total each table I do.
(I have a dedicated bit in it so Its kind of nice just to pick it up and go)
Would I every trade it for one of my corded ones - hell no.
"samson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Has anyone tried one of these? Is it worth the money?
>
> Thanks,
>
> S.
>
>
At that voltage, there is no reason that that router would have to be any
less powerfull than a 690 other than battery life. bably kept to a lower
current draw just to make it last a while. Couldn't be to low powered
though, the way the guys on the Router Workshop like to horse routers
around, if it was to underpowered, they would stall them. In any case, if it
develops more that 1/4 horse, it should cut just fine. I really don't see
the need though.
"Jim" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >
> The guys in The Router Workshop have at least one with at least 2
batteries.
> Every now and then, the router would run out of power during a cut. So,
> they just popped the dead battery off and put on a live one. I have
> wondered about the smoothness of cut that a router that must be way
> underpowered will yield.
>
> Jim
>
>
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Do not expect 690 performance nor excellence on any inside cut.
> Do expect light duty work for short periods where there is no way to
> get power.
> Worth it? Perhaps, but if you have power at your side: Maybe not.
> More on routers?
> See http://www.patwarner.com
> **********************************************
> samson wrote:
>> Has anyone tried one of these? Is it worth the money?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> S.
>
The guys in The Router Workshop have at least one with at least 2 batteries.
Every now and then, the router would run out of power during a cut. So,
they just popped the dead battery off and put on a live one. I have
wondered about the smoothness of cut that a router that must be way
underpowered will yield.
Jim
Jim wrote:
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Do not expect 690 performance nor excellence on any inside cut.
>> Do expect light duty work for short periods where there is no way to
>> get power.
>> Worth it? Perhaps, but if you have power at your side: Maybe not.
>> More on routers?
>> See http://www.patwarner.com
>> **********************************************
>> samson wrote:
>>> Has anyone tried one of these? Is it worth the money?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> S.
>>
> The guys in The Router Workshop have at least one with at least 2
> batteries.
> Every now and then, the router would run out of power during a cut. So,
> they just popped the dead battery off and put on a live one. I have
> wondered about the smoothness of cut that a router that must be way
> underpowered will yield.
>
> Jim
It would probably cut better than the Craftsman Professional router I
ebay'ed when I bought a real router.
I liked the idea since I have a small garage/shop I tend to carry things out
to the back yard and lay them on the picnic table so the cordless tools
work well there. Doesn't seem to be a current selling product though.
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 16:03:51 -0600, samson <[email protected]> wrote:
>Has anyone tried one of these? Is it worth the money?
If you really can't have AC power? Yes.
All the rest of the time? No.
Look at the tried and true performance, as well as features, that you
can get for the same money with a cord.